Collegiate Fellow & Assistant Professor, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
In response to emergent global solidarity movements for Palestinian liberation, a rich body of scholarship has emerged that more thoroughly examines the internationalization of the Palestinian struggle at the height of the decolonization movements that swept the Third World. One overlooked example of the global reach of the Palestine cause is the Puerto Rican independence movement, particularly a clandestine group of Puerto Rican radicals in Chicago committed to revolutionary armed struggle. Scholars have also paid scant attention to the place of Puerto Rico—the largest of the “not quite domestic, not quite foreign” U.S. territories in Israel’s efforts to combat international support for the Palestinian national movement by establishing close military, economic, and agricultural alliances with the decolonizing world. This strategy proved crucial for Israel’s international understanding. And it had significant implications for how the U.S. policed the Puerto Rican independence movement.
While the Puerto Rican independence movement wedded its rejection of U.S. colonialism in Puerto Rico to the Palestinian struggle, those very solidarities would also become weaponized in the United States’ emerging fight against international terrorism. This paper tackles a crucial historical irony: beyond some localized organizing in Chicago, connections between Puerto Ricans and Palestinians were largely inspirational and figurative. The archive reveals few, if any, accounts of Chicago’s Puerto Rican radicals traversing the physical borders of the United States despite how widely—and wildly— they imagined their affiliations with their Palestinian revolutionary comrades. There were very little material connections—at least not in the way that leaders of the Black Panther Party visited the PLO headquarters in Algeria and Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon, or the way that members of the Japanese Red Army helped carry out the Lod Airport attack in 1972.
And yet despite this absence of material connections, this paper will demonstrate how U.S. fears of Puerto Rican militancy, particularly its visions of solidarity with Palestine, fueled the expansion of domestic policing and counterterrorism policies in the 1980s. According to American policymakers—largely conservative but spanning across the political aisle—the emerging problem of international terrorism not only exploited the limits of “democratic principles,” like the right to privacy and freedom of association. It also demonstrated the ineffectiveness of global governing bodies like the United Nations, comprised as they were by “a rather large number” of countries who obtained “their independence from ‘colonialism’ through terrorist and guerilla warfare.” Throughout policy proposals, legislative debates, academic journals, and news reports, the United States’ ill-preparedness against terrorist threats was narrated repeatedly through its inability to police Puerto Rican radicals. These fears would operate in lockstep with demands for more expansive anti terrorism legislation which, under President Ronald Reagan, also ushered in a cohesive program of repression against domestic social movements. The United States had no “apparent immunity” to international terrorism, policymakers argued. Whether from direct support or through the loopholes Puerto Rican radicals exposed, international terrorism—most oftentimes assumed to be Palestinian but also Cuban or Soviet—would reach the United States.
Sara Awartani is an LSA Collegiate Fellow and assistant professor in the Department of American Culture at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. An interdisciplinary historian, her research, publications, and teaching focuses on twentieth-century U.S. social movements, interracial solidarities, policing, and the United States in the world, with special attention to Latinx and Arab American radicalisms. Her first book project, Solidarities of Liberation, Visions of Empire: Puerto Rico, Palestine, and American Global Power (under contract with University of North Carolina Press) chronicles a globally expansive story of Palestine liberation, Puerto Rican radicalism, and the United States' efforts to weaponize and police those freedom dreams.